Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (2024)

Business

The European Union levelled its first antitrust penalty against Apple on Monday, fining the U.S. tech giant nearly $2 billion US for breaking the bloc's competition laws by unfairly favouring its own music streaming service over rivals.

Apple to appeal, saying commission didn't uncover evidence of harm to consumers

The Associated Press

·

Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (1)

The European Union levelled its first antitrust penalty against Apple on Monday, fining the U.S. tech giant nearly $2 billion US for breaking the bloc's competition laws by unfairly favouring its own music streaming service over rivals.

Apple muzzled app developers from telling users where they could go to pay for cheaper music subscriptions instead of paying through iOS apps, said the European Commission, the 27-nation bloc's executive arm and top antitrust enforcer.

"This is illegal. And it has impacted millions of European consumers who were not able to make a free choice as to where, how and at what price to buy music streaming subscriptions," Margrethe Vestager, the EU's competition commissioner, said at a news conference in Brussels.

Apple —which said it contests the decision —behaved this way for a decade, resulting in "millions of people who have paid two, three euros more per month for their music streaming service than they would otherwise have had to pay," she said.

The 1.8 billion-euro fine follows an investigation triggered by a complaint from Swedish streaming service Spotify five years ago. Since then, the EU has drawn up new regulations taking effect this week to prevent tech giants from cornering digital markets.

The EU has led global efforts to crack down on Big Tech companies, including three fines for Google totalling more than 8 billion euros and charging Meta with distorting the online classified ad market.

LISTEN | The first monopoly trial of the moderninternet era:

Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (2)

Front Burner22:21Google on trial: U.S. takes on tech giant

On Tuesday, a judge in the U.S. will begin hearing arguments in what’s been called the first monopoly trial of the modern Internet era. At the heart of the case is whether Google used its search engine dominance to illegally throttle competition – an accusation Google denies, claiming “competition is just one click away.” Leah Nylen is an antitrust and investigations reporter with Bloomberg News, and today, she explains what the U.S. government is alleging, how Google is responding, and what this case could mean for the future of the Internet. Looking for a transcript of the show? They’re available here daily: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/frontburner/transcripts

Apple, meanwhile, also is trying to resolve a separate EU antitrust investigation into its mobile payments service by promising to open up its tap-and-go mobile payment system to rivals.

Decision 'ignores the realities' of market, says Apple

The fine for the music streaming investigation is so high because it includes a big extra lump sum to deter Apple from offending again and to act as a deterrent to other tech companies from carrying out similar offences, the commission said.

Apple hit back at both the commission and Spotify, saying it would appeal the penalty.

"The decision was reached despite the Commission's failure to uncover any credible evidence of consumer harm, and ignores the realities of a market that is thriving, competitive, and growing fast," the company said in a statement.

Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (3)

It said Spotify stood to benefit from the EU's move, asserting that the Swedish streaming giant that holds a 56 per centshare of Europe's music streaming market and that doesn't pay Apple for using its App Store met over 65 times with the commission during the investigation.

"Ironically, in the name of competition, today's decision just cements the dominant position of a successful European company that is the digital music market's runaway leader," Apple said.

Spotify said it welcomed the EU fine, without addressing Apple's accusations.

"This decision sends a powerful message —no company, not even a monopoly like Apple, can wield power abusively to control how other companies interact with their customers," Spotify said in a blog post.

  • How Amazon became the target of a crackdown on anti-consumer, anti-competitive behaviour
  • U.S. government, 17 states sue Amazon for abusing monopoly power

The commission's investigation initially centered on two concerns. One was the iPhone maker's practice of forcing app developers that are selling digital content to use its in-house payment system, which charges a 30 per centcommission on all subscriptions.

But the EU later dropped that to focus on how Apple prevents app makers from telling their users about cheaper ways to pay for subscriptions that don't involve going through an app.

The investigation found that Apple banned streaming services from telling users about how much subscription offers cost outside of their apps, including links in their apps to pay for alternative subscriptions or even emailing users to tell them about different pricing options.

"As a result, millions of European music streaming users were left in the dark about all available options," Vestager said, adding that the commission's investigation found that just over 20 per centof consumers who would have signed up to Spotify's premium service didn't do so because of the restrictions.

New rules against dominating digital markets

The fine comes just before new EU rules are set to kick in that are aimed at preventing tech companies from dominating digital markets.

The Digital Markets Act, due to take effect Thursday, imposes a set of do's and don'ts on "gatekeeper" companies including Apple, Meta, Google parent Alphabet, and TikTok parent ByteDance —under threat of hefty fines.

WATCH | The battle between TikTok and Universal Music:

Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (4)

Drake, Taylor Swift, other music may disappear from TikTok

1 month ago

Duration 2:01

Drake, Taylor Swift and others may vanish from TikTok because of a licensing dispute with the world’s biggest music label, Universal Music Group.

The DMA's provisions are designed to prevent tech giants from the sort of behaviour that's at the heart of the Apple investigation. Apple has already revealed how it will comply, including allowing iPhone users in Europe to use app stores other than its own and enabling developers to offer alternative payment systems.

Vestager warned that the commission would be carefully scrutinizing how Apple follows the new rules.

"Apple will have to open its gates to its ecosystem to allow users to easily find the apps they want, pay for them in any way they want and use them on any device that they want," she said.

Corrections and clarifications|Submit a news tip|

Apple fined almost $2B by the EU in music streaming antitrust probe | CBC News (2024)

FAQs

Did Apple hit with nearly $2 B EU antitrust fine? ›

LONDON (AP) — The European Union leveled its first antitrust penalty against Apple on Monday, fining the U.S. tech giant nearly $2 billion for unfairly favoring its own music streaming service by forbidding rivals like Spotify from telling users how they could pay for cheaper subscriptions outside of iPhone apps.

Why was Apple fined $2 billion? ›

Last week, the European Commission (EC) fined Apple roughly $2 billion over a complaint filed by Spotify that Apple was unfairly using the App Store to make it hard for streaming music services to compete.

Did Apple hit with near $2 billion fine in Europe over music streaming apps? ›

EU fine related to music-streaming apps comes after yearslong probe into the iPhone maker's app-store practices. about $2 billion, saying the iPhone maker set unfair rules for developers of music-streaming apps. The fine was one of the EU's largest-ever antitrust penalties.

Did the EU impose a fine on Apple? ›

After an extensive investigation, the European Commission has imposed a substantial fine of €1.8 billion, equivalent to about $1.95 billion, on tech giant Apple.

Why Apple's $2 billion fine is an $80 billion problem? ›

Apple's real problem is the way investors in the world's second most valuable company are reacting to the fine: In the first few hours of trading on Monday morning, they pushed Apple's stock down by as much as 3%. Which means, at the moment, Apple's $2 billion fine has cost it some $80 billion in market cap.

Did Apple get hit with the EU antitrust charge? ›

Commission fines Apple over €1.8 billion over abusive App store rules for music streaming providers. The European Commission has fined Apple over €1.8 billion for abusing its dominant position on the market for the distribution of music streaming apps to iPhone and iPad users ('iOS users') through its App Store.

How did Apple respond to the EU fine? ›

In a sharp response to the fine, Apple released a statement in which it attacked the EU, claiming enforcers failed to uncover “any credible evidence of consumer harm, and ignored the realities of the market that is thriving, competitive, and growing fast.”

What is the Apple $2 B fine? ›

On Monday, Brussels fined Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) 1.84 billion euros ($2 billion) for hindering competition among music streaming rivals through App Store restrictions. The penalty included a basic fine of 40 million euros and a substantial lump sum as a deterrent, marking the EU's first action and dinging AAPL stock.

Why did Spotify sue Apple? ›

The fine originates in a legal complaint filed with the European Commission by Spotify in 2019, challenging the restrictions and fees Apple places on developers listing their apps in the App Store.

Why has Apple been fined? ›

Apple has been fined €1.8bn (£1.5bn) by the EU for breaking competition laws over music streaming. The firm had prevented streaming services from informing users of payment options outside the Apple app store, the European Commission said.

Why did the European Union sue Apple? ›

Apple muzzled streaming services from telling users about payment options available through their websites, which would avoid the 30% fee charged when people pay through apps downloaded with the iOS App Store, said the European Commission, the 27-nation bloc's executive arm and top antitrust enforcer. “This is illegal.

How much does Apple pay for streaming? ›

With an average pay per stream rate of $0.01–one cent–the tech giant pays about double what its main competitor, Spotify, offers.

What is the controversial issue with Apple? ›

Several families were seeking damages and compensation for the death or serious injury of children who they claim were working in cobalt mines in Apple's supply chain. Also in 2019 the Ranking Digital Rights (RDR) Corporate Accountability Index gave Apple a score of just 46%.

What countries don't allow Apple products? ›

Among the Apple-less countries are Syria, North Korea, Sudan and Cuba, which face trade sanctions from the United States. That means the “exportation, reexportation, sale or supply” of any Apple goods from the U.S. or an American anywhere is prohibited in those countries, according to Apple's global trade compliance.

What country is suing Apple? ›

In the lawsuit, the U.S. accused Apple of making it harder for consumers to block competitors and cited five examples where Apple used mechanisms to suppress technologies that would have increased competition among smartphones: so-called super apps, cloud stream game apps, messaging apps, smartwatches and digital ...

What was the fine for Apple in Europe? ›

Apple on Monday was fined 1.8 billion euros ($1.95 billion) by European Union regulators for thwarting competition among music streaming rivals, a severe punishment levied against the tech giant in a long-simmering battle over the powerful role it plays as gatekeeper of the App Store.

Why was Apple fined in Europe? ›

Apple has been hit with a $3 billion fine by the European Union for unfairly favouring its own music streaming service over its competition. The European Commission imposed the 1.84 billion euros fine on Apple as part of an antitrust case that was brought on by a complaint by Spotify around music streaming competition.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 5858

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.